Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Why Aren't Kids Reading the Classics?

I have been brewing this post for a long while, and my whistle has finally blown on my mental teakettle. I thought it was a topic that would resonate with other homeschoolers.

I use the Internet a great deal whenever I do my curriculum planning for my kids. I have had a lot of success using a literature approach throughout. Even before the children could read personally, family read-alouds of the classics were a solid part of their education. After they had mastered the skill, we continued with read-alouds , just raising the level of the written word.

Once I was planning for a high schooler, I often checked with traditional school reading lists, to ensure that I was not missing some critical work . I've been long astounded at the lack of true classics on many high school lists, instead willed with pop fiction like Barbara Kingsolver or Stephen King. Where did Thoreau, Bradbury, Dickens, and Cather go?

This year, my shock has continued to grow as I am teaching creative writing at our homeschooling co-op. I am finding that a lack of exposure to classic children's literature extends to many homeschoolers as well. How can you teach a literary element like anthropomorphism when half of the children have never heard of Aesop's Fables or Beatrix Potter? I struggled through a list of classics I was certain they had heard of: Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of Nim, Cricket in Times Square, Watership Down, and others. I only to hit on a common chord when I mentioned "Charlotte's Web." They had, after all, seen the movie. Sigh.

HoneyGirl, who is in the class, tried another approach by listing the new book series like "Guardians of G'Hoole" and "Warriors." Oh, they had all heard and read those. In further investigation, they explained that it is only "cool" to get the books on the front tables of the book store. Double sigh!

I find it remarkable to note that the writing ability of those who have been raised with the classics is far and above those who are fed a literary diet of "Captain Underpants." This is no mere coincidence. Long ago I had given my kids the analogy of books for nurishment. The classics were referred to as the meat and vegetables that kept us mentally sharp. The pop-fiction was the dessert. The kids happily adopted this thinking, already reading a classic for each "Mind-Twinkie."

Charlotte Mason called pop fiction "twaddle", and I sadly now have a class full of students that only reinforce her claims. I have spoken to some of the parents, giving them suggested reading lists for the kids. I have tried explaining that in order to develop into a good writer, students must have experience reading or hearing quality literature. It seems sadly that most of these parents have never read the classics either.

When I got home last night, I knew exactly what I needed to do. I dug out the address links from my last class reunion, and made a phone call to the son of the woman who gave my mother a classics reading list for me: Mrs. Reitz, my childhood librarian.

Mrs. Reitz reconized my love of books, and took the time to help my mom, a high school drop-out, by creating her own "great books" list of well over a hundred books. My mom, bless her heart, made sure that read every book on that list. Mrs. Reitz would take time to discuss these books with me each week, helping me grow and understand.

Now in her 70s, I got her address. Her long overdue thank you letter is going in the mail today, as well as a hand-crocheted bookmark. My wish would be that every child had a "Mrs. Reitz" in their lives. Later today, we are going to bake some banana bread and take it to the lovely librarians of our local library as thanks for the job they do!

9 comments:

Sarah said...

What a great post. I've been on the hunt for some new books for Hels. In going through the YA section at Borders, there was not one classic on the shelf. It's all fantasy or teen angst/social drivel. She's reading some good historical fiction, but I'd love a classics list...

Christina said...

That is amazing, I thought that was a a sure space where homeschoolers were leading the way! And you are spot-on about the reading/writing link. I pretty much do unschooling until my kids are and have developed the self-discipline for structured academics (not magically, but through other responsibilities). When I started doing formal writing instruction with my eldest (using Pudewa's writing program), it was astounding to me what her abilities were, all from reading all the time, and mostly excellent books that she loved.

Ambleside Online has excellent book lists, organized by grade level.

Summer said...

I can't believe there re kids being raised without the classics. it's just a shock to the system.

shaun said...

Funny you should post this today -- yesterday I was talking to some homeschooling friends who had briefly sent their girls to a new all-girls charter school this fall. One of the things they didn't like: the 5th grade language arts began with reading Twilight!

I haven't read the books, but

1. I'm not sure they are OK for all 10-11 year olds.

2. I am pretty sure that kids who want to read that can read it on their own time and read more substantial stuff in school.

My kids have read a Captain Underpants or two (when DH let them bring some home from the library once -- argh!!), and I let them check out this weird series called W.I.T.C.H. recently, but it's clear that this is -- like you say -- a Twinkie and not a main course.

YA fiction is especially bleak. I can't imagine sending my language loving kid to a high school English class and having them read pop fiction *as academic work.*

sarah p said...

Oh I have so much empathy for you! The teens in my class did not read classics, and it made teaching them rather difficult at times - especially the writing class. I was asked to put together a literature study for them, and found it almost impossible to come up with a book that they could manage (because their reading comprehension was low due to the junk they'd been imbibing) and their appreciation of books was focussed all on thrills, and their parents had such low expectations. Here I am wanting to introduce Jane Austen or Charles Dickens to them and their mothers are recommending a sci fi book for a literature study!

Luckily, I left before I had to organise that class. It was depressing. I'd already seen how these children had to be taught Romeo and Juliet - very slowly, in basic little pieces that they still barely understood.

I think for some less confident homeschooling mothers, the concrete subjects like maths and science are easier to teach and so literature gets neglected.

Don't even start me on poetry.

You were very lucky with your librarian. When I approached our childrens librarian when Rose was moving on to chapter books, her recommendation was Junie B Jones!!!

Mama Monkey said...

Thought provoking post! I love the fact that you wrote to Mrs. Reitz. She will be thrilled to know how she impacted your life.

The Glasers said...

We are Charlotte Mason homeschoolers. My 16 yo son David and I read lots and lots of classics. . . right now, we are reading The Count of Monte Cristo, Oliver Twist, Great Expectations, Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde, The Black Arrow, Ivanhoe, Rob Roy, and I could name more . . .

My fault is I do not like most modern novels, but I figure he’ll get plenty of those in college. We are reading C. S. Lewis’ Screwtape Letters and Perelandra plus some good modern biographys (John Perry’s Unshakable Faith and also David McCullough’s John Adams).

One cool lesson he figured out at a young age, the book is almost always better than the movie. He walked out of seeing Dr. Doolittle 2 with his friends and we stopped watching a horrible version of The Five Children and It a few years back.

The best thing about homeschooling is that I get to read books I never read in school and I am loving every minute of it.

JoVE said...

When I was talking to the director of the drama school where Tigger is doing a program, she said that the reason she had chosen Great Expectations for the group was because she thought the kids weren't getting the exposure to teh classics at school. There are some good people out there but it seems they are all running up against the same thing.

Tigger reads a lot of trash. But she also reads a lot of good stuff, including recently reading Jane Eyre. I haven't read many of the classics myself but I think variety is important.

And it is depressing when folks lower their educational expectations instead of using education to gradually raise students skills. That seems to be prevalant across the system.

Lori said...

somewhere around here i have an article i ripped from the newspaper about how even college reading lists have become dumbed down over the last couple decades .. to the point where high school students are being asked to read things like “tuesdays with morrie” instead of “moby dick”.

when my 11yo asked the children’s librarian for help finding an adventure book “that isn’t about wizards and isn’t a series, please”, she scratched her head and asked him to name something he’d read and enjoyed. “the three musketeers.” which one?, she asked. he looked at me, raised his eyebrows. i shrugged. he looked back at her -- “i didn’t know there was more than one!” she looked at me; i said, “he read the actual three musketeers”. she couldn’t recommend anything for him! my son later said, i thought she would recommend a lot of books i’d already read, and she didn’t recommend any of them!

what does it mean when even the librarians don’t recommend classic books to children?